<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Osmosis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footytalk.com.au/osmosis.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footytalk.com.au/osmosis.html</link>
	<description>The Worlds First Australian Rules Footy Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 11:35:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.footytalk.com.au/osmosis.html/comment-page-1#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footytalk.com.au/?p=753#comment-148</guid>
		<description>&quot;We have a game where the one-to-one contest has been removed.  The excitement of a high mark (speccie) and a hard but fair hit has disappeared.&quot;

This is simply not true. Pick any game from any week this year and you will see one-on-one contests, high marks and hard hits. What dinosaurs like Osmosis mean when they spout this rubbish is that he can&#039;t get his jollies watching punch-ups, coat-hangers, blood and concussion as part of his footy. This whole romaticising of old-school football never admits that most games were slow, one-dimensional slugfests. The average game of footy now is a zillion times faster. The skills on display in the modern game are incomparable. And it&#039;s still a hard, at times brutal, game that demands courage, stamina, and football smarts.

The pity of this kind of rant is that there IS too much fiddling with the rules. Hands in the Back, for instance, is a terrible rule which makes for the softest of free kicks. But that doesn&#039;t mean the game is soft or that it was better twenty, thirty years ago. Watch some home and away footage from the seventies - not just the grand finals - and you&#039;ll see. Today&#039;s game is better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We have a game where the one-to-one contest has been removed.  The excitement of a high mark (speccie) and a hard but fair hit has disappeared.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is simply not true. Pick any game from any week this year and you will see one-on-one contests, high marks and hard hits. What dinosaurs like Osmosis mean when they spout this rubbish is that he can&#8217;t get his jollies watching punch-ups, coat-hangers, blood and concussion as part of his footy. This whole romaticising of old-school football never admits that most games were slow, one-dimensional slugfests. The average game of footy now is a zillion times faster. The skills on display in the modern game are incomparable. And it&#8217;s still a hard, at times brutal, game that demands courage, stamina, and football smarts.</p>
<p>The pity of this kind of rant is that there IS too much fiddling with the rules. Hands in the Back, for instance, is a terrible rule which makes for the softest of free kicks. But that doesn&#8217;t mean the game is soft or that it was better twenty, thirty years ago. Watch some home and away footage from the seventies &#8211; not just the grand finals &#8211; and you&#8217;ll see. Today&#8217;s game is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Explosion</title>
		<link>http://www.footytalk.com.au/osmosis.html/comment-page-1#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Explosion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 10:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footytalk.com.au/?p=753#comment-122</guid>
		<description>I hate to disagree with a valued listener Ryan.  I will agree that the AFL as an organisation sucks, however any mention of the round ball game is banned by my good self as editor in chief :).

Still, it is an acquired taste that I have not acquired at all.  A bit like Fosters Lager really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to disagree with a valued listener Ryan.  I will agree that the AFL as an organisation sucks, however any mention of the round ball game is banned by my good self as editor in chief <img src='http://www.footytalk.com.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>Still, it is an acquired taste that I have not acquired at all.  A bit like Fosters Lager really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.footytalk.com.au/osmosis.html/comment-page-1#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 11:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footytalk.com.au/?p=753#comment-120</guid>
		<description>That article is spot on. I think AFL is absolute crap. Its too americanised in my opinion and I prefer the local footy anyday. Im also more excited about the A-League these days. Bring on a 2nd Melbourne team and lets watch a game that doesnt change the rules every year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That article is spot on. I think AFL is absolute crap. Its too americanised in my opinion and I prefer the local footy anyday. Im also more excited about the A-League these days. Bring on a 2nd Melbourne team and lets watch a game that doesnt change the rules every year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

